Monthly Archives: May 2011

IVR aggravation continues to spawn clever hacks

People hate phone menus. It’s as simple as that. That frustration spawned the ever-popular GetHuman.com site many years ago. (And it’s many modern copycats.)

Here’s another angle:

VoIP-News had a great article called “50-Plus Hacks and Tips to Get to a Real Person at Any Corporation”.

Come see us at the Avaya User Group Conference

We’re extremely excited to be in Las Vegas this weekend, at the International Avaya User Group Conference (IAUG).

Today has already been action-packed with sessions and an opening reception.

Check #iaug on Twitter to get a sense for what’s going on.

If you’re attending, please stop by our booth, #910 in the Milano Ballroom, and say hi.

How Twitter is changing the customer service equation

A recent study found that:

… at least once a week, 33% of active Twitter users share opinions about companies or products, while 32% make recommendations and 30% ask for them.

The April 2010 study by ROI Research was commissioned by Performics and is available here.

The good and bad

Twitter allows awareness of your customer service quality to propagate quickly through a community or the public at large. On the plus side, the benefits of providing good service can be felt more quickly and more strongly. On the downside, stories of bad service propagate even more quickly.

Don’t give people an easy target for complaints

Make sure you fill the social media echo chamber with good echoes, not bad. Step 1: Don’t give people an easy target for complaints!  Two such easy targets are bad phone menus and long hold times. The good news is they are easy to fix. Fonolo’s visual navigation and virtual queuing services can turn those bad echoes into good echoes with no changes to your call center and minimal expense.

Is your IVR aggravating your customers?

Dislike for IVR systems is fairly universal. In my line of work, I hear many stories of frustration with the phone menu. Seems everyone has a pet peeve or an outrageous tale to tell. Here are a couple good ones.

Call center commentator Greg Levin writes:

IVR. In many customers’ minds, this three-letter acronym is a four-letter word. It’s not uncommon for callers to mutter a diverse range of other forbidden words whenever interacting – or trying to interact – with a contact center’s IVR system.

Blogger Susan Hura lists some other complaints:

… ads for stuff we don’t want, long legal disclaimers or having to repeat information once transferred to a live call center representative. I hate them all, but my number one complaint is navigating through an interactive voice response (IVR) system only to be told, “Sorry, if you want to do this you’ll have to visit our Web site at www-dot…

What are your IVR complaints? Send them in we’ll compile a list for a future post.

Live agent chat and its escalation-to-voice problem

As the multi-channel call center gets more and more common, implementations of click-to-chat get more common. Like click-to-call, the goal with chat is that you can raise the conversion rate of browsers into buyers and/or lower the abandonment rate.

Hand-off problems

Advantages over click-to-call is that (in theory at least) an agent can handle multiple chat conversations at the same time, thus making a chat cheaper than a phone call. The problem with the theory is that chat session often have to escalate to a phone call, either by user choice or because of policy reasons. This is a recurring challenge for multi-channel client care – hand-off between channels. For more, see the post “The Multi-channel challenge”.

Let’s talk

If your company has installed click-to-chat or is planning to, we’d love to talk to you about how you’re addressing this challenge. It’s possible that, without a smooth hand-off from chat to voice, the gains may all be wiped out. We have been working on a solution (still in beta) to this problem at Fonolo and we’d love to talk to you about it.

 

Multi-site call centers make multi-channel communication even harder

The challenges faced today by the executive in charge of customer service are very different from what they were ten years ago. Since I spend most of my days talking to these executives I have a front-row seat to the dramatic change that is happening in the industry.

The success of the call center used to be measurable with a few key metrics: Average hold time, average handle time, cost per call, first call resolution, etc.  But today the dominant challenge is how to manage the different communication channels: Web, phone call, email, chat and social media. In particular, it can be very tricky to keep the experience consistent across those various channels.

Consistency is a big challenge

What makes those challenges even tougher is that, for a company with large call volume (>10m calls per year), it’s a good bet that the call center is multi-site to some extent.  Being multi-sited makes it harder to achieve consistency because it impedes both innovation and optimization. Read Shai’s recent post on this for a great overview.

In [multi-site operations] one of the biggest challenges … is providing a consistent experience across all locations…  A hosted contact center environment provides a centralized platform from which to do that, and is more flexible than premise-based solutions that can be difficult to manage across multiple sites, regions, time zones, broadband reliability, communications protocols, etc.

- Jon Arnold, Industry Analyst

Fonolo can help

One of our goals at Fonolo is help provide a consistent interface. Behind the scenes, our system automatically stays in sync with your IVR, so all the business rules that are tied to that system are propagated to the visual interface on your website (click-to-call) and your mobile app (tap-to-call). If you want to find out more, drop me a note.

The smartphone will drive the evolution of the call center (cool video)

The rapid rise of the smartphone is hardly news anymore. But to refocus your attention on just how dramatic it is, here is a video illustrating Android activations over the last few years. (“Activation” is the first time an Android-powered smartphone contacts the network.)

Credits: Android Developer via Android Central.

For more academic view, consider the chart below. It was compiled from data presented by Morgan Stanley’s Mary Meeker in late 2009:

The unstoppable tide of the smart phone.

For Fonolo, this trend is continues to affirm our belief that smartphone will drive the evolution of the call center experience, and more specifically that “The future of the call center is a visual interface”.

Fonolo fixes the dreaded “data pass-through” problem

Our mission at Fonolo is to fix common aggravations with the call center experience. One common aggravation is the “data pass-through” problem. You may not have heard this phrase before, but you have surely experienced it. Whenever you are asked for information by the IVR and then asked for the same information again by the agent, the culprit is broken data-pass-through.

Why is it so common?

Fixing this integration point seems like an obvious investment for companies to make. Clearly the time required for agents to collect account numbers (or other “call attached” data) has a real cost. As does the aggravation of customers that answer the agent’s request by saying: “I just punched in my number! Why don’t you have that information?”

The problem usually arises because 1) the company is running multiple call centers; 2) it is rare for any two call centers to be built on identical technology; and 3) there are no standards for interoperability between call center equipment. The result is incompatible proprietary systems which means that call centers have to fall back on the lowest common denominator functionality. The following quote says it all:

Most midsize to large contact centers are based on complex and unstable architectures that integrate many disparate technologies into distinct, unique and costly combinations of components … [even] acquiring an IVR system from vendors such as Avaya, Nortel Networks and Genesys does not ensure tight integration with those companies’ ACD or CTI products.

- Yankee Group, “VoIP and Lower TCO will Drive Adoption of Hosted
On-Demand Contact Centers” Yankee Group, April 2006
.

Fonolo to the rescue

Fonolo can fix this problem because it lives “outside” the realm of the call center equipment. With our visual interface the caller can enter information before the call and it gets delivered to the agent, regardless of the way the call center is built.

Pre-call questions

You can find out more here.